VirtualBox

source: kBuild/vendor/sed/current/testsuite/SPENCER.tests

Last change on this file was 599, checked in by bird, 18 years ago

GNU sed 4.1.5.

File size: 14.1 KB
Line 
1# regular expression test set
2# Lines are at least three fields, separated by one or more tabs. "" stands
3# for an empty field. First field is an RE. Second field is flags. If
4# C flag given, regcomp() is expected to fail, and the third field is the
5# error name (minus the leading REG_).
6#
7# Otherwise it is expected to succeed, and the third field is the string to
8# try matching it against. If there is no fourth field, the match is
9# expected to fail. If there is a fourth field, it is the substring that
10# the RE is expected to match. If there is a fifth field, it is a comma-
11# separated list of what the subexpressions should match, with - indicating
12# no match for that one. In both the fourth and fifth fields, a (sub)field
13# starting with @ indicates that the (sub)expression is expected to match
14# a null string followed by the stuff after the @; this provides a way to
15# test where null strings match. The character `N' in REs and strings
16# is newline, `S' is space, `T' is tab, `Z' is NUL.
17#
18# The full list of flags:
19# - placeholder, does nothing
20# b RE is a BRE, not an ERE
21# & try it as both an ERE and a BRE
22# C regcomp() error expected, third field is error name
23# i REG_ICASE
24# m ("mundane") REG_NOSPEC
25# s REG_NOSUB (not really testable)
26# n REG_NEWLINE
27# ^ REG_NOTBOL
28# $ REG_NOTEOL
29# # REG_STARTEND (see below)
30# p REG_PEND
31#
32# For REG_STARTEND, the start/end offsets are those of the substring
33# enclosed in ().
34
35# basics
36a & a a
37abc & abc abc
38abc|de - abc abc
39a|b|c - abc a
40
41# parentheses and perversions thereof
42a(b)c - abc abc
43a\(b\)c b abc abc
44a( C EPAREN
45a( b a( a(
46a\( - a( a(
47a\( bC EPAREN
48a\(b bC EPAREN
49a(b C EPAREN
50a(b b a(b a(b
51# gag me with a right parenthesis -- 1003.2 goofed here (my fault, partly)
52a) - a) a)
53) - ) )
54# end gagging (in a just world, those *should* give EPAREN)
55a) b a) a)
56a\) bC EPAREN
57\) bC EPAREN
58a()b - ab ab
59a\(\)b b ab ab
60
61# anchoring and REG_NEWLINE
62^abc$ & abc abc
63a^b - a^b
64a^b b a^b a^b
65a$b - a$b
66a$b b a$b a$b
67^ & abc @abc
68$ & abc @
69^$ & "" @
70$^ - "" @
71\($\)\(^\) b "" @
72# stop retching, those are legitimate (although disgusting)
73^^ - "" @
74$$ - "" @
75b$ & abNc
76b$ &n abNc b
77^b$ & aNbNc
78^b$ &n aNbNc b
79^$ &n aNNb @Nb
80^$ n abc
81^$ n abcN @
82$^ n aNNb @Nb
83\($\)\(^\) bn aNNb @Nb
84^^ n^ aNNb @Nb
85$$ n aNNb @NN
86^a ^ a
87a$ $ a
88^a ^n aNb
89^b ^n aNb b
90a$ $n bNa
91b$ $n bNa b
92a*(^b$)c* - b b
93a*\(^b$\)c* b b b
94
95# certain syntax errors and non-errors
96| C EMPTY
97| b | |
98* C BADRPT
99* b * *
100+ C BADRPT
101? C BADRPT
102"" &C EMPTY
103() - abc @abc
104\(\) b abc @abc
105a||b C EMPTY
106|ab C EMPTY
107ab| C EMPTY
108(|a)b C EMPTY
109(a|)b C EMPTY
110(*a) C BADRPT
111(+a) C BADRPT
112(?a) C BADRPT
113({1}a) C BADRPT
114\(\{1\}a\) bC BADRPT
115(a|*b) C BADRPT
116(a|+b) C BADRPT
117(a|?b) C BADRPT
118(a|{1}b) C BADRPT
119^* C BADRPT
120^* b * *
121^+ C BADRPT
122^? C BADRPT
123^{1} C BADRPT
124^\{1\} bC BADRPT
125
126# metacharacters, backslashes
127a.c & abc abc
128a[bc]d & abd abd
129a\*c & a*c a*c
130a\\b & a\b a\b
131a\\\*b & a\*b a\*b
132# The following test is wrong. Using \b in an BRE or ERE is undefined.
133# a\bc & abc abc
134a\ &C EESCAPE
135a\\bc & a\bc a\bc
136\{ bC BADRPT
137a\[b & a[b a[b
138a[b &C EBRACK
139# trailing $ is a peculiar special case for the BRE code
140a$ & a a
141a$ & a$
142a\$ & a
143a\$ & a$ a$
144a\\$ & a
145a\\$ & a$
146a\\$ & a\$
147a\\$ & a\ a\
148
149# back references, ugh
150a\(b\)\2c bC ESUBREG
151a\(b\1\)c bC ESUBREG
152a\(b*\)c\1d b abbcbbd abbcbbd bb
153a\(b*\)c\1d b abbcbd
154a\(b*\)c\1d b abbcbbbd
155^\(.\)\1 b abc
156a\([bc]\)\1d b abcdabbd abbd b
157a\(\([bc]\)\2\)*d b abbccd abbccd
158a\(\([bc]\)\2\)*d b abbcbd
159# actually, this next one probably ought to fail, but the spec is unclear
160a\(\(b\)*\2\)*d b abbbd abbbd
161# here is a case that no NFA implementation does right
162\(ab*\)[ab]*\1 b ababaaa ababaaa a
163# check out normal matching in the presence of back refs
164\(a\)\1bcd b aabcd aabcd
165\(a\)\1bc*d b aabcd aabcd
166\(a\)\1bc*d b aabd aabd
167\(a\)\1bc*d b aabcccd aabcccd
168\(a\)\1bc*[ce]d b aabcccd aabcccd
169^\(a\)\1b\(c\)*cd$ b aabcccd aabcccd
170
171# ordinary repetitions
172ab*c & abc abc
173ab+c - abc abc
174ab?c - abc abc
175a\(*\)b b a*b a*b
176a\(**\)b b ab ab
177a\(***\)b bC BADRPT
178*a b *a *a
179**a b a a
180***a bC BADRPT
181
182# the dreaded bounded repetitions
183# The following two tests are not correct:
184#{ & { {
185#{abc & {abc {abc
186# '{' is always a special char outside bracket expressions. So test ony BRE:
187{ b { {
188{abc b {abc {abc
189{1 C BADRPT
190{1} C BADRPT
191# Same reason as for the two tests above:
192#a{b & a{b a{b
193a{b b a{b a{b
194a{1}b - ab ab
195a\{1\}b b ab ab
196a{1,}b - ab ab
197a\{1,\}b b ab ab
198a{1,2}b - aab aab
199a\{1,2\}b b aab aab
200a{1 C EBRACE
201a\{1 bC EBRACE
202a{1a C EBRACE
203a\{1a bC EBRACE
204a{1a} C BADBR
205a\{1a\} bC BADBR
206# These four tests checks for undefined behavior. Our implementation does
207# something different.
208#a{,2} - a{,2} a{,2}
209#a\{,2\} bC BADBR
210#a{,} - a{,} a{,}
211#a\{,\} bC BADBR
212a{1,x} C BADBR
213a\{1,x\} bC BADBR
214a{1,x C EBRACE
215a\{1,x bC EBRACE
216# These two tests probably fails due to an arbitrary limit on the number of
217# repetitions in the other implementation.
218#a{300} C BADBR
219#a\{300\} bC BADBR
220a{1,0} C BADBR
221a\{1,0\} bC BADBR
222ab{0,0}c - abcac ac
223ab\{0,0\}c b abcac ac
224ab{0,1}c - abcac abc
225ab\{0,1\}c b abcac abc
226ab{0,3}c - abbcac abbc
227ab\{0,3\}c b abbcac abbc
228ab{1,1}c - acabc abc
229ab\{1,1\}c b acabc abc
230ab{1,3}c - acabc abc
231ab\{1,3\}c b acabc abc
232ab{2,2}c - abcabbc abbc
233ab\{2,2\}c b abcabbc abbc
234ab{2,4}c - abcabbc abbc
235ab\{2,4\}c b abcabbc abbc
236((a{1,10}){1,10}){1,10} - a a a,a
237
238# multiple repetitions
239# Wow, there is serious disconnect here. The ERE grammar is like this:
240# ERE_expression : one_char_or_coll_elem_ERE
241# | '^'
242# | '$'
243# | '(' extended_reg_exp ')'
244# | ERE_expression ERE_dupl_symbol
245# ;
246# where ERE_dupl_symbol is any of the repetition methods. It is clear from
247# this that consecutive repetition is OK. On top of this, the one test not
248# marked as failing must fail. For BREs the situation is different, so we
249# use the four tests.
250#a** &C BADRPT
251a** bC BADRPT
252#a++ C BADRPT
253#a?? C BADRPT
254#a*+ C BADRPT
255#a*? C BADRPT
256#a+* C BADRPT
257#a+? C BADRPT
258#a?* C BADRPT
259#a?+ C BADRPT
260#a{1}{1} C BADRPT
261#a*{1} C BADRPT
262#a+{1} C BADRPT
263#a?{1} C BADRPT
264#a{1}* C BADRPT
265#a{1}+ C BADRPT
266#a{1}? C BADRPT
267#a*{b} - a{b} a{b}
268a\{1\}\{1\} bC BADRPT
269a*\{1\} bC BADRPT
270a\{1\}* bC BADRPT
271
272# brackets, and numerous perversions thereof
273a[b]c & abc abc
274a[ab]c & abc abc
275a[^ab]c & adc adc
276a[]b]c & a]c a]c
277a[[b]c & a[c a[c
278a[-b]c & a-c a-c
279a[^]b]c & adc adc
280a[^-b]c & adc adc
281a[b-]c & a-c a-c
282a[b &C EBRACK
283a[] &C EBRACK
284a[1-3]c & a2c a2c
285a[3-1]c &C ERANGE
286a[1-3-5]c &C ERANGE
287a[[.-.]--]c & a-c a-c
288# I don't thing the error value should be ERANGE since a[1-] would be
289# valid, too. Expect EBRACK.
290#a[1- &C ERANGE
291a[1- &C EBRACK
292a[[. &C EBRACK
293a[[.x &C EBRACK
294a[[.x. &C EBRACK
295a[[.x.] &C EBRACK
296a[[.x.]] & ax ax
297a[[.x,.]] &C ECOLLATE
298# This test is invalid. "one" is no collating symbol in any standardized
299# locale.
300# a[[.one.]]b & a1b a1b
301a[[.notdef.]]b &C ECOLLATE
302a[[.].]]b & a]b a]b
303a[[:alpha:]]c & abc abc
304a[[:notdef:]]c &C ECTYPE
305a[[: &C EBRACK
306a[[:alpha &C EBRACK
307a[[:alpha:] &C EBRACK
308a[[:alpha,:] &C ECTYPE
309a[[:]:]]b &C ECTYPE
310a[[:-:]]b &C ECTYPE
311a[[:alph:]] &C ECTYPE
312a[[:alphabet:]] &C ECTYPE
313[[:alnum:]]+ - -%@a0X- a0X
314[[:alpha:]]+ - -%@aX0- aX
315[[:blank:]]+ - aSSTb SST
316[[:cntrl:]]+ - aNTb NT
317[[:digit:]]+ - a019b 019
318[[:graph:]]+ - Sa%bS a%b
319[[:lower:]]+ - AabC ab
320[[:print:]]+ - NaSbN aSb
321[[:punct:]]+ - S%-&T %-&
322[[:space:]]+ - aSNTb SNT
323[[:upper:]]+ - aBCd BC
324[[:xdigit:]]+ - p0f3Cq 0f3C
325a[[=b=]]c & abc abc
326a[[= &C EBRACK
327a[[=b &C EBRACK
328a[[=b= &C EBRACK
329a[[=b=] &C EBRACK
330a[[=b,=]] &C ECOLLATE
331# This test is invalid. "one" is no collating symbol in any standardized
332# locale.
333#a[[=one=]]b & a1b a1b
334
335# complexities
336a(((b)))c - abc abc
337a(b|(c))d - abd abd
338a(b*|c)d - abbd abbd
339# just gotta have one DFA-buster, of course
340a[ab]{20} - aaaaabaaaabaaaabaaaab aaaaabaaaabaaaabaaaab
341# and an inline expansion in case somebody gets tricky
342a[ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab] - aaaaabaaaabaaaabaaaab aaaaabaaaabaaaabaaaab
343# and in case somebody just slips in an NFA...
344a[ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab][ab](wee|week)(knights|night) - aaaaabaaaabaaaabaaaabweeknights aaaaabaaaabaaaabaaaabweeknights
345# fish for anomalies as the number of states passes 32
34612345678901234567890123456789 - a12345678901234567890123456789b 12345678901234567890123456789
347123456789012345678901234567890 - a123456789012345678901234567890b 123456789012345678901234567890
3481234567890123456789012345678901 - a1234567890123456789012345678901b 1234567890123456789012345678901
34912345678901234567890123456789012 - a12345678901234567890123456789012b 12345678901234567890123456789012
350123456789012345678901234567890123 - a123456789012345678901234567890123b 123456789012345678901234567890123
351# and one really big one, beyond any plausible word width
3521234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890 - a1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890b 1234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890
353# fish for problems as brackets go past 8
354[ab][cd][ef][gh][ij][kl][mn] - xacegikmoq acegikm
355[ab][cd][ef][gh][ij][kl][mn][op] - xacegikmoq acegikmo
356[ab][cd][ef][gh][ij][kl][mn][op][qr] - xacegikmoqy acegikmoq
357[ab][cd][ef][gh][ij][kl][mn][op][q] - xacegikmoqy acegikmoq
358
359# subtleties of matching
360abc & xabcy abc
361a\(b\)?c\1d b acd
362aBc i Abc Abc
363a[Bc]*d i abBCcd abBCcd
3640[[:upper:]]1 &i 0a1 0a1
3650[[:lower:]]1 &i 0A1 0A1
366a[^b]c &i abc
367a[^b]c &i aBc
368a[^b]c &i adc adc
369[a]b[c] - abc abc
370[a]b[a] - aba aba
371[abc]b[abc] - abc abc
372[abc]b[abd] - abd abd
373a(b?c)+d - accd accd
374(wee|week)(knights|night) - weeknights weeknights
375(we|wee|week|frob)(knights|night|day) - weeknights weeknights
376a[bc]d - xyzaaabcaababdacd abd
377a[ab]c - aaabc abc
378abc s abc abc
379() s abc @abc
380a* & b @b
381
382# Let's have some fun -- try to match a C comment.
383# first the obvious, which looks okay at first glance...
384/\*.*\*/ - /*x*/ /*x*/
385# but...
386/\*.*\*/ - /*x*/y/*z*/ /*x*/y/*z*/
387# okay, we must not match */ inside; try to do that...
388/\*([^*]|\*[^/])*\*/ - /*x*/ /*x*/
389/\*([^*]|\*[^/])*\*/ - /*x*/y/*z*/ /*x*/
390# but...
391/\*([^*]|\*[^/])*\*/ - /*x**/y/*z*/ /*x**/y/*z*/
392# and a still fancier version, which does it right (I think)...
393/\*([^*]|\*+[^*/])*\*+/ - /*x*/ /*x*/
394/\*([^*]|\*+[^*/])*\*+/ - /*x*/y/*z*/ /*x*/
395/\*([^*]|\*+[^*/])*\*+/ - /*x**/y/*z*/ /*x**/
396/\*([^*]|\*+[^*/])*\*+/ - /*x****/y/*z*/ /*x****/
397/\*([^*]|\*+[^*/])*\*+/ - /*x**x*/y/*z*/ /*x**x*/
398/\*([^*]|\*+[^*/])*\*+/ - /*x***x/y/*z*/ /*x***x/y/*z*/
399
400# subexpressions
401.* - abc abc -
402a(b)(c)d - abcd abcd b,c
403a(((b)))c - abc abc b,b,b
404a(b|(c))d - abd abd b,-
405a(b*|c|e)d - abbd abbd bb
406a(b*|c|e)d - acd acd c
407a(b*|c|e)d - ad ad @d
408a(b?)c - abc abc b
409a(b?)c - ac ac @c
410a(b+)c - abc abc b
411a(b+)c - abbbc abbbc bbb
412a(b*)c - ac ac @c
413(a|ab)(bc([de]+)f|cde) - abcdef abcdef a,bcdef,de
414# the regression tester only asks for 9 subexpressions
415a(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)(j)k - abcdefghijk abcdefghijk b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j
416a(b)(c)(d)(e)(f)(g)(h)(i)(j)(k)l - abcdefghijkl abcdefghijkl b,c,d,e,f,g,h,i,j,k
417a([bc]?)c - abc abc b
418a([bc]?)c - ac ac @c
419a([bc]+)c - abc abc b
420a([bc]+)c - abcc abcc bc
421a([bc]+)bc - abcbc abcbc bc
422a(bb+|b)b - abb abb b
423a(bbb+|bb+|b)b - abb abb b
424a(bbb+|bb+|b)b - abbb abbb bb
425a(bbb+|bb+|b)bb - abbb abbb b
426(.*).* - abcdef abcdef abcdef
427(a*)* - bc @b @b
428
429# do we get the right subexpression when it is used more than once?
430a(b|c)*d - ad ad -
431a(b|c)*d - abcd abcd c
432a(b|c)+d - abd abd b
433a(b|c)+d - abcd abcd c
434a(b|c?)+d - ad ad @d
435a(b|c?)+d - abcd abcd c
436a(b|c){0,0}d - ad ad -
437a(b|c){0,1}d - ad ad -
438a(b|c){0,1}d - abd abd b
439a(b|c){0,2}d - ad ad -
440a(b|c){0,2}d - abcd abcd c
441a(b|c){0,}d - ad ad -
442a(b|c){0,}d - abcd abcd c
443a(b|c){1,1}d - abd abd b
444a(b|c){1,1}d - acd acd c
445a(b|c){1,2}d - abd abd b
446a(b|c){1,2}d - abcd abcd c
447a(b|c){1,}d - abd abd b
448a(b|c){1,}d - abcd abcd c
449a(b|c){2,2}d - acbd acbd b
450a(b|c){2,2}d - abcd abcd c
451a(b|c){2,4}d - abcd abcd c
452a(b|c){2,4}d - abcbd abcbd b
453a(b|c){2,4}d - abcbcd abcbcd c
454a(b|c){2,}d - abcd abcd c
455a(b|c){2,}d - abcbd abcbd b
456a(b+|((c)*))+d - abd abd b,-,-
457a(b+|((c)*))+d - abcd abcd c,c,c
458
459# check out the STARTEND option
460[abc] &# a(b)c b
461[abc] &# a(d)c
462[abc] &# a(bc)d b
463[abc] &# a(dc)d c
464. &# a()c
465b.*c &# b(bc)c bc
466b.* &# b(bc)c bc
467.*c &# b(bc)c bc
468
469# plain strings, with the NOSPEC flag
470abc m abc abc
471abc m xabcy abc
472abc m xyz
473a*b m aba*b a*b
474a*b m ab
475"" mC EMPTY
476
477# cases involving NULs
478aZb & a a
479aZb &p a
480aZb &p# (aZb) aZb
481aZ*b &p# (ab) ab
482a.b &# (aZb) aZb
483a.* &# (aZb)c aZb
484
485# word boundaries (ick)
486[[:<:]]a & a a
487[[:<:]]a & ba
488[[:<:]]a & -a a
489a[[:>:]] & a a
490a[[:>:]] & ab
491a[[:>:]] & a- a
492[[:<:]]a.c[[:>:]] & axcd-dayc-dazce-abc abc
493[[:<:]]a.c[[:>:]] & axcd-dayc-dazce-abc-q abc
494[[:<:]]a.c[[:>:]] & axc-dayc-dazce-abc axc
495[[:<:]]b.c[[:>:]] & a_bxc-byc_d-bzc-q bzc
496[[:<:]].x..[[:>:]] & y_xa_-_xb_y-_xc_-axdc _xc_
497[[:<:]]a_b[[:>:]] & x_a_b
498
499# past problems, and suspected problems
500(A[1])|(A[2])|(A[3])|(A[4])|(A[5])|(A[6])|(A[7])|(A[8])|(A[9])|(A[A]) - A1 A1
501abcdefghijklmnop i abcdefghijklmnop abcdefghijklmnop
502abcdefghijklmnopqrstuv i abcdefghijklmnopqrstuv abcdefghijklmnopqrstuv
503(ALAK)|(ALT[AB])|(CC[123]1)|(CM[123]1)|(GAMC)|(LC[23][EO ])|(SEM[1234])|(SL[ES][12])|(SLWW)|(SLF )|(SLDT)|(VWH[12])|(WH[34][EW])|(WP1[ESN]) - CC11 CC11
504CC[13]1|a{21}[23][EO][123][Es][12]a{15}aa[34][EW]aaaaaaa[X]a - CC11 CC11
505Char \([a-z0-9_]*\)\[.* b Char xyz[k Char xyz[k xyz
506a?b - ab ab
507-\{0,1\}[0-9]*$ b -5 -5
508a*a*a*a*a*a*a* & aaaaaa aaaaaa
509(\b){0} - x @x -
510\(\b\)\{0,0\} b abc @abc -
511a(\b){0}c - ac ac -
512a(.*)b(\1){0}c - abc abc @bc,-
513a(.*)b(\1){0}c - axbc axbc x,-
514
515a\(\(b*\)\)c\1d b abbcbbd abbcbbd bb,bb
516a\(\([bc]\)\)\2d b abcdabbd abbd b,b
517a\(\(\(\([bc]\)\)\3\)\)*d b abbccd abbccd cc,cc,c,c
518a(b)(c)d - abcd abcd b,c
519a(((b)))c - abc abc b,b,b
520a(((b|(((c))))))d - abd abd b,b,b,-,-,-
521a(((b*|c|e)))d - abbd abbd bb,bb,bb
522a((b|c)){0,0}d - ad ad -,-
523a((b|c)){0,1}d - abd abd b,b
524a((b|c)){0,2}d - abcd abcd c,c
525a((b+|((c)*)))+d - abd abd b,b,-,-
526a((b+|((c)*)))+d - abcd abcd c,c,c,c
527(((\b))){0} - x @x -,-,-
528a(((.*)))b((\2)){0}c - abc abc @bc,@bc,@bc,-,-
529a(((.*)))b((\1)){0}c - axbc axbc x,x,x,-,-
530
531\b & SaT @aT
532\b & aT @aT
533a.*\b & abT ab
534\b & STSS
535\B & abc @bc
536\B & aSbTc
537\B & SaT @SaT
538\B & aSTSb @TSb
Note: See TracBrowser for help on using the repository browser.

© 2024 Oracle Support Privacy / Do Not Sell My Info Terms of Use Trademark Policy Automated Access Etiquette